Maharastra state assembly elections 2019

!!Maharashtra state assembly elections 2019!!
Reproduced from Modern Astrology December 2019 issue.

The trends of the upcoming State Assembly elections in Maharashtra can be gauged through the Annual chart of the state on the basis of the Zodiacal sign of the state. The chart of the moment of the Sun transition over the zodiac sign of the capital is the annual chart of the state or country.

The zodiac sign of Mumbai (18⁰58′30′′N, 72⁰49′33′′E), the capital of the state, is Scorpio of the 30^th degree.

!!Democracy and Indian election process!!

!!Democracy and the Indian election process!!

Democracy:

1-    A democracy is a form of government in which the people rule, directly or through elected representatives.

2-    It is the rule of the public, for the public by the public.

Voting:

Voting is considered a characteristic symptom of most types of democracy. Voting is a method of decision-making or revealing the choice of people through which a person or group presents their side. Therefore, this is an extremely important process on which democracy remains alive.

Faulty voting process:

The Indian election process is a very defective one. It violates the basic sentiments of democracy. It is only appropriate when there are only two candidates or just two types of political parties. But when more than two candidates or parties are in the election field, this process is false or unscrupulous. This process selects the candidates who are not liked by most people. And in this way, most people have to be ruled by a person or party acting on their unsupported ideas or principles. As if three candidates are on the ground, the public may have to be ruled by 40% of the voters, while the sum of divisive votes for both the deceased candidates is 60% in any way (not more than 40^th % for one candidate). Candidates selected in this manner will always determine a 40% public favorable policy, which is against the desire of most people.

 Potential solutions:

1-    The number of candidates who are in the electoral fray, so many numbers should be attributed to one vote.  If the voter marks only a mark (vote), then all the numbers should go in favor of that candidate. There are two types of arrangements possible for marking more than one mark on a voter.

A-   All points are distributed equally among all candidates. Or

B-    Considering the order of marking the voter's button or marking the vote as the voter's choice, assuming the first, second, third ... choice, the points will be divided according to the same preference. Such as 50% on the first choice, 30% on the second, and 20% on his 3^rd choice, etc. This vote digit division can also be decided by the number of candidates as (1) 60-40 (2) 50-30-20 (3) 40-30-20-10 etc. Or in this method, a condition can also be added as per the requirement that only the first three or four preferences will be awarded.

2-    Political alliances of parties should be completely restricted after elections. It is also contrary to the original sentiments of democracy. Political parties compromise with their ideology and principles to profit themselves. The majority of the people opposed to the ruling party or candidates have to be ruled by them.  Because the opinion of the public is never taken into consideration, and the elected representatives combine with the parties of conflicting ideologies to grab power.

Though this method can be problematic for implementation in rural and backward areas, where even today, elderly voters face trouble understanding the voting process. Yet it can be implemented in urban and developed areas. In this way, we can avoid situations like Karnataka and Maharashtra and the probability of interim elections in the country. Interim elections cause heavy losses of wealth for the country and candidates. It also causes frustration for the voters.

-----------------------------------------------------https://pragyapath25.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------------------------------Raghvendra Khare

!! लोकतन्त्र एवं भारतीय चुनाव प्रक्रिया !!

!! लोकतन्त्र एवं भारतीय चुनाव प्रक्रिया !!

लोकतन्त्र :

1-      वह शासन प्रणाली जिसमे प्रमुख सत्ता लोक या जनता अथवा उसके चुने हुए प्रतिनिधियों के हाथ में होती है और जिसकी नीति आदि निर्धारित करने का सब लोगों को समान रूप से अधिकार होता है.

2-      जनता द्वारा, जनता के लिए, जनता का शासन है.

मतदान :

मतदान को लोकतंत्र के अधिकांश प्रकारों का चरित्रगत लक्षण माना जाता है. मतदान निर्णय लेने या अपना विचार प्रकट करने की विधि है. जिसके माध्यम से कोई व्यक्ति या समूह अपना पक्ष प्रस्तुत करता है. अतः यह एक अत्यंत महत्वपूर्ण प्रक्रिया है जिसकी बुनियाद पर लोकतन्त्र जिन्दा रहता है.

दोष पूर्ण मतदान प्रक्रिया :

भारतीय चुनाव प्रक्रिया अत्याधिक दोष पूर्ण है. वह लोकतंत्र की मूल भावनाओं का उल्लंघन करती है. यह तब तक तो उपयुक्त है जबकि मात्र दो उम्मीद्वार अथवा मात्र दो प्रकार के सैद्धान्तिक दलों के लिए मतदान हो. किन्तु दो से अधिक उम्मीदवारों, दलों के चुनाव मैदान में होने से यह प्रक्रिया झूठी या बेईमान सावित होती है. इस प्रक्रिया से उन उम्मीदवारों का चयन होता है जिनको की अधिकतर लोग पसंद नहीं करते और इस प्रकार से अधिकांश जनता को उनके द्वारा असमर्थित विचार या सिद्धांत पर अमल करने वाले व्यक्ति या दल से शासित होना पड़ता है. जैसे कि तीन उम्मीद्वार मैदान में होने से जनता को 40 % मत पाने वाले से शासित होना पड़ सकता है जवकि दोनों हारे हुए प्रत्यासियों का आपसी मत विभाजन 60 % हो साथ ही किसी एक के पक्ष में 40% से अधिक न हो. इस प्रकार से चुना गया उम्मीद्वार हमेशा ही 40 % जनता के अनुकूल नीति या कार्य निर्धारण करेगा जो की बहुतायत जनता की नापसंद होगी.

सम्भावित समाधान :

1-      जितने उम्मीद्वार चुनाव मैदान में हो उतने अंक एक मत पर निर्धारित हों. यदि मतदाता, मात्र एक निशान चिन्हित करता है तो सारे अंक उस प्रत्याशी के पक्ष में जाना चाहिये.

मतदाता के एक से अधिक निशान चिन्हित करने पर दो प्रकार की व्यवस्था सम्भव है.

अ-   सारे अंक सभी प्रत्याशियों में समान रूप से बाँट दिये जाये. अथवा

ब- मतदाता के बटन दवाने या निशान चिन्हित करने के क्रम को मतदाता की क्रमानुसार पहली, दूसरी, तीसरी... पसंद मानते हुए, उसी वरीयता अनुसार मत अंक विभाजित कर दिये जाये. जैसे कि पहले मत पर 50% अंक दूसरे  मत पर 30% और तीसरे पर 20% आदि. इस मत अंक विभाजन को प्रत्याशियों की संख्या अनुसार भी तय किया जा सकता है जैसे (1) 60-40 (2) 50-30-20 (3) 40-30-20-10 इत्यादि.

इस पद्धति में एक शर्त भी आवश्यकता अनुसार जोड़ी जा सकती है कि प्रथम तीन या चार वरीयताओं को ही मत अंक प्रदान किये जायें.

2-      चुनाव बाद के गठबन्धनों पर पूर्णतः रोक होना चाहिये. यह भी लोकतन्त्र की मूल भावनाओं के विपरीत है. राजनैतिक दल अपना उल्लू सीधा करने के लिये अपनी विचारधारा एवं सिद्धान्तों से समझोता कर लेते हैं. जिस विचारधारा या उम्मीदवारों के विरोध में अधिकतर जनता होती है उसे उन से ही शासित होना पड़ता है. क्योकि गठबंधन के लिए कभी भी जनता की राय नहीं ली जाती और चुने हुए प्रत्यासी सत्ता हथियाने के लिये परस्पर विरोधी विचारधारा के दलों से भी गठबंधन कर लेते है.

यद्यपि इस पद्धति को अति ग्रामीण एवं पिछड़े इलाकों में लागू करने में समस्या हो सकती है जहाँ आज भी बुजुर्ग मतदातओं को मतदान प्रक्रिया समझने में दिक्कतें होती है फिर भी इसे शहरी एवं विकसित इलाकों में तो लागू किया ही जा सकता है.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------..................राघवेन्द्र

India _ Pakistan

!!India _ Pakistan!!

An Astrological Analysis of the India-Pakistan Relationship

Based on my formula for calculating the zodiacal sign of a place, India's capital, New Delhi (28N37, 77E13), is governed by the sign Capricorn and the Sravana Nakshatra. Conversely, Pakistan's capital, Islamabad (33N43, 73E04), is governed by Aries and the Ashwini Nakshatra. An astrological examination of these signatures reveals a relationship of innate and perpetual hostility.

The foundational ideology of Pakistan, centered on its separation from Hindustan based on religion and the ambition to establish an Islamic rule, is the root cause of this enmity, standing in direct contrast to India's identity, which is primarily based on Hinduism. The cells of this conflict are thus embedded in the very fabric of Pakistan's origin, and its political future often depends on reinforcing this foundational theme. Consequently, relations between the two countries will likely never be normalized, with an untold war perpetually simmering on their boundaries since the date of Pakistan's formation.

The Foundational Astrological Relationship

1. Zodiacal Sign and Planetary Rulers: The signs of the two countries, Capricorn and Aries, form a hostile 4-10 square aspect. Their respective ruling planets, Saturn (for India) and Mars (for Pakistan), are natural and bitter enemies in Vedic astrology, representing structure versus aggression, and endurance versus impatience.

2. The Nakshatra (Tara Kuta) Relationship: The dynamic between the ruling Nakshatras is critically imbalanced:

   • India's Perspective: From India's Sravana Nakshatra, Pakistan's Ashwini is the 7th star. This falls in the Vadha Tara group, which signifies danger and destruction. This suggests that interactions initiated by Pakistan are perceived as a direct threat to India's existence.

   • Pakistan's Perspective: From Pakistan's Ashwini Nakshatra, India's Sravana is the 22nd star. When divided by 9, the remainder is 4, placing it in the Kshema Tara group, signifying well-being and security. This starkly different perspective suggests that India, from its position, is astrologically inclined to act with restraint and can never be truly ruthless towards Pakistan, as the interaction does not fundamentally threaten it in the same way.

3. House Disposition: From Pakistan's sign (Aries), India's sign (Capricorn) falls in the benefic 10th house of status, career, and public standing. Conversely, from India's sign (Capricorn), Pakistan's sign (Aries) falls in the 4th house of domestic affairs, property, and inner stability, a placement that can be malefic when occupied by an enemy.

4. Exaltation and Debilitation Dynamics: This is perhaps the most telling factor. Mars, the aggressive ruler of Pakistan, achieves its maximum strength (exaltation) in Capricorn, the sign of India. At the same time, Saturn, the disciplined ruler of India, suffers its maximum weakness (debilitation) in Aries, the sign of Pakistan.

Conclusion on Bilateral Relations: This powerful astrological dynamic suggests that any interaction, whether hostile or friendly, tends to energize Pakistan's position (Mars exalted in India's sign) while simultaneously challenging or weakening India's core stability (Saturn debilitated in Pakistan's sign). Pakistan, therefore, seems to "shine" or gain impetus from its relationship with India, whereas India consistently risks a loss of status or stability. From this perspective, it would be astrologically wise for India to avoid developing deep or dependent relations with Pakistan.

Astrological Dynamics with Other Neighbors

Astrologically, a country's worst enemies often emerge from the direction opposite to its natal sign. For Pakistan (Aries, ruling the East), the opposite direction is West.

• Afghanistan (ruled by Taurus) and Iran (ruled by Scorpio) are situated to Pakistan's west. The sign Scorpio (Iran) falls in the challenging 8th house (transformation, crisis, death) from Pakistan's natal sign of Aries. However, if their Nakshatra relationship falls in a benefic Tara, the impact would be moderated. This suggests that Iran might be positioned to "teach a lesson" to Pakistan, but not really, as Iran Anuradha is in a benefic group of Tara from Ashwani Islamabad. The author posits that, from this framework, other Western nations with Airy and Watery signs are also astrologically positioned to exert transformative pressure on the region.

• China (Beijing, ruled by Taurus and Krittika Nakshatra) is situated to the east of Islamabad, aligning with the direction of Pakistan's own sign. This suggests a generally supportive relationship. Beijing's sign, Taurus, is the 2nd house (finance, resources) from Islamabad's Aries, reflecting China's role as a financial supporter. However, the Nakshatra relationship tells a different story. China's Krittika star falls in an evil Tara group from Pakistan's Ashwini, suggesting that this long-term relationship will ultimately prove frustrating and detrimental. In this light, China acts as a slow poison to Pakistan.

The Crisis of Identity: A Socio-Astrological Perspective

A nation, like an individual, requires a self-identity to lead a respectful existence—an identity formed from its culture, history, and language. The nation is not merely a parcel of land. Pakistan's inherent astrological conflict with its geographical and historical roots is reflected in its societal challenges. By largely rejecting the indigenous culture, language, and history of the land upon which it was formed (for instance, the historical figure Bhagat Singh has no place in its history books) in favor of an adopted Arab or Afghan identity, Pakistan faces a great crisis of identity.

This self-deceptive attempt to graft the culture and language of other lands onto itself creates a fundamental instability. The leadership, to distract the general populace from these deficiencies, finds it necessary to perpetually remain in a state of dispute with India. This external conflict serves to mask the internal crisis of identity that is written in its very astrological signature.